Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0974620000180020177
Bulletin of Dongnam Health University
2000 Volume.18 No. 2 p.177 ~ p.186
A Study of Self-Efficacy, Social Suppor, Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile for Middle Aged Men


Abstract
The purpose of this descriptive study was to analyze the degree of self-efficacy, social support, health promoting lifestyle profile in middle aged men. The subjects of this study were 82 men in middle aged group. The degree of self -efficacy was measured used to self efficacy scale a four point likert scale consisting of 17 items, developed by Sherer(1982), social support was measured used to social scale a five point likert scale consisting of 18 items, developed by Cohen & Hoberman(1983),health promoting lifestyle profile was measured used to health promoring lifestyle profile scale a four point likert scale consisting of 47 items grouped into five subsections, developed by Walker(1982), and the demographic variables include 11 items. The period of data collection was from Mar. 2 to Apr. 15 2000. The data were analyzed using the SAS- program. The demographic variables were analyzed using frequency, percentage, degree of self efficacy, social support, health promoting lifestyle profile, were analyzed using means and standard deviations, the relationship between the demographic variables and self efficacy, social support, health promoting lifestyle profile were analysing t-test and ANOVA, and correlation of self efficacy, social support, health promoting lifestyle were Pearson Coefficiant. The results of this study were as follows.
1. The means of total score showed that self -efficacy was 2.79¡¾.36, social support was 2.65¡¾.46, health promoting lifestyle profile was 2.42¡¾.33. 2. A statistically significant difference were found in relationship of the following demographic variable to the degree of social support: age (F=-.363, P<.001)/health responsibility: monthly income (F=2.353,P<.05)/personal relationship: occupation(F=2.920, ,PCO5),present health problem(F=2.352. P<.05)/stress management:age (F=-.204, PC.05),monthly income(F=2.570. PCO5)
3. A statistically significant difference were found between the social support and self- efficacy(F=-.269,P<.01),health promoting lifestyle profile and social support (F=.502, P<.001),health promoting lifestyle profile and self efficacy (F=-.249, P<.001).
KEYWORD
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information